The arrival of AI-generated research papers marks a turning point that could radically accelerate discovery—or drown it in ...

A PLOS Biology analysis finds papers led by women spend 7%-15% longer in peer review, a delay that can undermine promotion, funding, and career advancement for clinician-researchers.

AI Scientist, an autonomous research tool, first released in 2024, has now undergone peer review, highlighting its strengths ...

A recent article published in Nature highlights the overwhelming number of peer-reviewed research papers that were retracted in 2023. To some, this may appear to be a reason for concern with how ...

James Zou is a computer scientist at Stanford University who has been exploring how large language models (LLMs) can assist ...

An autonomous AI system has written a scientific paper from scratch and cleared the first round of peer review at a workshop ...

What is peer review of teaching (PRT)? Peer review is recognized in academia as a measure for ensuring quality work that meets standards and expectations among experts. Similarly, peer review of ...

Most of the top 100 medical journals provide guidance on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) during the peer review process, with many explicitly prohibiting its use, a study showed. Of the 78 top ...

Peer reviews cost firms time and effort, and some accountants believe the process is focused on finding mistakes, but the purpose of peer reviews is to enhance engagement quality. Peer reviews can ...

The National Institutes of Health longstanding "payline" has helped everyone see the connection between the scientific peer review process and NIH grant funding decisions. What will the latest NIH ...

The following types of contribution to Nature Portfolio journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Letters, Brief Communications, Matters Arising, Technical Reports, Analysis, Resources, Reviews, ...